Backily

News

Civil-society seats vacant in Pakistan's RTI commissions, diminishing effectiveness

By Abhijeet Mandal ·

A recent report reveals that Pakistan's right-to-information commissions have been functioning without civil-society representatives, crucial for ensuring public accounta...

Civil-society seats vacant in Pakistan's RTI commissions, diminishing effectiveness

A report released on October 4, 2026, has unveiled a troubling issue within Pakistan's federal and provincial right-to-information (RTI) commissions: these entities have been operating devoid of civil-society members for several years. This absence of representatives who advocate for public interests undermines the commissions' capacity to effectively enforce the public's right to information, according to an analysis by Dawn. These commissions are intended to carry out the mandate of Article 19-A of Pakistan's Constitution, emphasizing the need for a balanced composition that includes diverse perspectives, particularly those from civil society organizations [1].

The timeline of these vacancies highlights systemic issues. The civil-society seat in both the federal commission and the Sindh provincial body has reportedly remained unfilled since January 2024. In Punjab, the vacancy has lingered since March 2025, while in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, it has been vacant since April 2026. NationPress corroborates these dates, noting that the problem spans all major RTI commissions. Notably, despite being established only in 2025, the Balochistan commission also faces leadership vacancies [2].

The implications of these vacancies are significant. Zahid Abdullah, a former federal information commissioner, emphasized that the lack of a civil-society representative prevents a necessary balancing influence in decision-making. He pointed out that if the two serving members disagree, there is no third party to resolve the deadlock. This sentiment is echoed in reports from both Dawn and NationPress, which outline the original intent of these commissions to include representatives from various sectors, thus reflecting public concerns and fostering transparency and accountability [1].

These vacancies do not merely reflect administrative shortcomings; they are symptomatic of broader weaknesses within the RTI framework in Pakistan. Dawn illustrates this with a case study where an RTI request made to the Punjab police chief on February 23, 2026, led to a prolonged appeal process. The individual received a decision on June 9, 2026, showcasing potential vulnerabilities in enforcing the RTI [1].

Moreover, the Punjab Information Commission's annual report for 2024-25 recommended 14 amendments to provincial RTI laws, aiming to address issues such as prolonged complaint timelines and new grounds for rejecting requests. These proposed changes highlight the ongoing need to fortify the RTI structure in light of existing deficits [1].

In broader context, an analysis in The News reinforces the argument that the inclusion of civil society in RTI commissions is crucial for fostering public accountability and engagement. The absence of these representatives leaves citizens without a voice in a system designed to prioritize their interests. While this does not explicitly prove the specific dates of vacancies, it supports the notion that the absence of civil-society members adversely affects the institutional integrity of the RTI commissions [3].

The situation fosters a concerning scenario where Pakistan's RTI commissions, designed to champion the public's right to information and promote governmental transparency, operate without critical input from civil society. With vacancies noted from January 2024 to April 2026 across multiple commissions, the report underscores a significant gap in representation that could impede the effectiveness and independence of these bodies [1].

Sources

Researched and edited with AI assistance.

Featured image: AI-generated representative image.

View full article on Backily