Backily

News

Karnataka's voter-roll dispute intensifies amid allegations of fraud

By Abhijeet Mandal ·

Allegations of fraudulent voter deletions have escalated in Karnataka, leading to inquiries and directives from the Chief Electoral Officer.

Karnataka's voter-roll dispute intensifies amid allegations of fraud

The dispute surrounding Karnataka's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter rolls escalated over the October 1-4 weekend in 2026. Allegations emerged from local Congress leaders suggesting that there was a coordinated effort to submit bulk, pre-printed Form 7 applications aimed at deleting the names of eligible voters from the electoral rolls. In light of these claims, the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) issued a directive for electoral officers to pursue legal action against applicants accused of knowingly submitting false statements or declarations in Forms 6, 6A, 7, and 8, while also mandating formal inquiries to ensure due process before proceeding with any action. Following this assurance, Congress leaders reportedly ended their planned dharna, indicating a degree of temporary resolution in their protest actions against the alleged discrepancies in the voter roll processes. [1]

As the situation unfolded, Karnataka's Home Minister Priyank Kharge, on October 4, decried the practice of distributing numerous pre-printed Form 7s, asserting that regulations do not allow non-Booth Level Agents (BLAs) to possess "400 to 500" such forms. He raised concerns regarding the credibility of the SIR exercise in light of these practices, questioning how more than 400 forms were purportedly procured and emphasizing that even BLAs should not be in possession of pre-printed forms. Kharge characterized this issue as undermining the integrity of the electoral process and also criticized the actions of the BJP and the Election Commission, dubbing the SIR process a "drama." He further called for an IIT audit of the Form 6 software amid allegations of tampering. [2]

The crux of the dispute relates to the evidence of pre-filled Form 7 submissions that allegedly included personal information such as voters' names, addresses, and EPIC numbers. Chief Minister D K Shivakumar demanded answers from the CEO regarding the origins of these forms, the method by which EPIC numbers were accessed, and whether there have been any breaches of voter data. Shivakumar described the situation as indicative of a "criminal conspiracy" against voters, while adding that the Election Commission and legal advisers were currently reviewing the concerns raised. [3]

Reports from Indian Express on October 2-3 indicated that the CEO's office acknowledged the need to take action against the bulk submissions of Form 7 applications. This indicated a recognition of the gravity of the allegations, as these forms serve as objections utilized to change or delete names on the electoral rolls. Attached to various Congress memorandums were three FIRs regarding these issues, with complaints listed from numerous districts including Mysuru, Bidar, and Belagavi, pointing to systemic efforts to manipulate the electoral rolls. [1]

According to the Election Commission’s public portal, Form 7 is specifically used for requesting the deletion of names from the electoral rolls, thus underscoring its central role in the ongoing conflict. The Election Commission's FAQs clarify that the CEO is ultimately responsible for the preparation, revision, and correction of electoral rolls within the state, reflecting the CEO's pivotal role in this electoral oversight matter. [4]

As of the latest information available, the controversy continues to hinge on the allegations surrounding the misuse of Form 7 and the bulk submissions of pre-printed forms. The CEO’s office has initiated legal action and inquiries into the situation, while Congress leaders have maintained pressure for a rigorous investigation. However, reports do not provide a definitive resolution regarding the legality of the alleged bulk applications, focusing instead on outlining the various allegations and counterclaims, along with the initiation of legal and administrative actions without a final adjudication on the matter. [1]

Sources

Researched and edited with AI assistance.

Featured image: AI-generated representative image.

View full article on Backily